TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting

By Erin Kelleher and Rob Tobiassen, Compliance Consultant and Former Chief Counsel (TTB)

On Friday, TTB issued an industry circular to help winery licensees struggling with an unintended consequence of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) - - which became effective on January 1 of this year. The “fix” to the problem described below is only temporary and expires on June 30, 2018. Hopefully that is enough time for a permanent solution to be adopted in a technical corrections bill, or by Rule change.

The Problem – In-Bond Wine in fulfillment warehouses is not eligible for tax credits because of a drafting error in the Act

The Act provides new excise tax credits for wine removed during 2018 and 2019 (see 26 USC 5041(c)(8)), which results in significant tax savings for producing wineries removing wine from bond during these years. However, because of an oversight (using the term charitably) and botched drafting, wine removed directly from bonded premises where the wine was not produced (i.e., fulfillment companies and bonded wine storage facilities) is not eligible for the new tax credits.

Put another way, fulfillment houses may not stand in the shoes of the producing winery that transferred the wine in bond for storage.

Essentially, for 2018 and 2019, the transferee in bond arrangement enacted in 1997 (which permits tax credits to be taken by bonded fulfillment houses) is suspended (see 26 USC 5041(c)(6)). While this unintended consequence of the speed in which the Act was drafted sent the industry scrambling, TTB has acted quickly and professionally to address the problem, at least through June 30th.

The TTB Fix – a temporary “Alternate Procedure”

TTB’s industry circular announces the availability of a temporary “Alternate Procedure” which allows producing wineries to reap the benefit of the favorable excise tax credits while continuing to utilize the services of fulfillment companies. TTB is permitting wineries to tax determine and tax pay wine of their own production stored at a bonded third-party facility without physically bringing the product back to the winery where it was produced for removal. Specifically, by using the Alternate Procedure wineries will constructively receive the wine back at their licensed premises virtually and through detailed documentation and reporting only. Most important, wine producers may take advantage of this alternate procedure without seeking any additional TTB approval.

Procedurally, it works like this:

The producing wineries report the wine on TTB Form 5120.17temp (Report of Wine Premises Operations) as “received in bond” and also “removed tax-paid” from the fulfillment company. Importantly, this “removed tax-paid” means that the producing winery must pay the tax (taking advantage of the new credits) on its next tax return. The industry circular explains how to handle the taxes if the winery files an annual return. Wineries then invoice the product as tax-paid back to the fulfillment company. The fulfillment company then records and ships the wine as tax-paid to the customer. This Alternate Procedure only applies to wine the producing winery declares as removed from bond on or before June 30, 2018. After that date another solution must be found.

The documentation related to the wine must clearly reference use of the alternate procedure under Industry Circular 2018-1.

Fulfillment Company Requirements

On its next regular Report of Wine Premises Operations filed after June 30, 2018, the fulfillment company must report any wine it “transfers” to a producing winery under this alternate procedure on TTB Form 5120.17temp in Part I, Section A, on line 15, and/or in Part I, Section B, Line 9, and (2) list the names of any wine producer for whom they are storing tax-paid wine under this alternate procedure in Part X, Remarks.

Once wine changes status at the fulfillment company under the invoice from the producing winery; records must the reflect the product as tax-paid.

Tax-Paid Storage Areas not required (if they do not already exist), and mandatory package marking

If the fulfillment company has a tax-paid area, the invoiced wine must be moved to that area. If they do not, the fulfillment company will not be required to file an amendment to designate one area solely for the storage of products “tax-paid” under this procedure. (Note that other tax-paid wine not covered by the Alternate Procedure must be stored on taxpaid premises.)

Rather, the fulfillment company must clearly identify the wine in their records as “tax-paid” and must mark the outermost packaging of the taxpaid wine in such a way it is readily identifiable as tax-paid. It cannot be over stressed that these markings are mandatory if the Alternate Procedure is used, and the markings must be clear that the wine stored this way is being stored under the Alternate Procedure under the industry circular.

While we give kudos to TTB for quickly addressing a vexing issue facing the wine industry in the wake of the swift implementation of the Act, this botched law will nonetheless create confusion during the next four months and the next two tax years.

  1. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  2. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  3. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  4. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  5. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  6. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  7. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  8. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  9. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  10. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  11. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  12. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  13. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  14. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  15. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  16. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  17. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  18. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  19. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  20. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  21. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  22. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  23. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  24. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  25. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  26. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  27. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  28. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope
  29. New Alcohol Delivery Oversight on the Horizon
  30. Michigan: Canary in the DtC Coal Mine?
  31. California ABC and Federal Credit Laws – Active Enforcement and Lots of Questions!
  32. Big Bottles For The Holidays - The Highest Calling Of The Winemaker's Art
  33. FINAL COMMENTS TO TTB NOTICE 160 DUE ON WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 7TH – WE ARE ASKING THE TTB TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD AGAIN TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRY NEGOTIATION AND ALIGNMENT OF INTERESTS
  34. SONOMA COUNTY WINERY USE PERMITS, EVENT RESTICTIONS AND DTC
  35. New TTB Labeling Requirement Regulations: Out-of-State Bottling Is Not Created Equal and Consumers Right to Know Where the Grapes in their Wine Come from is Compromised
  36. Isn't A Written Agreement With A Distributor Worthless In A Franchise State?
  37. Crowd Funding for Alcohol Producers and Retailers – Down the Rabbit Hole with the Tied House laws
  38. Everything you ever wanted to know about the BPA Warning Statement but were afraid to ask
  39. AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights
  40. “Better Late Than Never”-- Judge in Illinois Dismisses 201 Sales Tax Cases against Retailers
  41. The Day the Music Almost Died: The Story of the BottleRock ABC Accusations, the ABC Appeals Board and a Victory for a Common Sense Interpretation of the Tied House Laws
  42. The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means
  43. Counterfeit or Artisanal Mexican Spirits? Pick your Poison, or your lime wedge
  44. Warning - CA ABC enforcement teams are on the prowl this weekend!
  45. RELIEF AT LAST! ILLINOIS MOVES TO FIX THE SALES TAX LAWSUITS AGAINST OUT-OF-STATE SELLERS BUT PROPOSES TO PENALIZE WINERIES AND RETAILERS THAT SHIP WITHOUT PERMITS
  46. The TTB Speaks on Category Management or, be Careful What you Ask for Because you might Get it!
  47. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Announces the Addition of Jeremy Siegel to its team of top beverage law lawyers
  48. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part IV
  49. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part III
  50. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part II
  51. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part I
  52. Hinman & Carmichael LLP is Hiring!
  53. John Hinman Presents NBI Webinar on Basics of Alcohol Beverage Law
  54. ABC DISMISSES SAVE MART GRAPE ESCAPE ACCUSATION BUT REFUSES TO ADOPT JUDGE’S DECISION FINDING NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABC VIOLATIONS
  55. Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!
  56. The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle
  57. Santa Claus isn’t the only one coming to town this Christmas!
  58. Arizona's Direct to Consumer Shipping Rules - An Exercise in Complexity
  59. AB 780 - Social Media and the ABC: The California Legislative “Fix” that Fails
  60. Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases
  61. A Modest Proposal – Adopt the federal rule on Tied-House liability in California
  62. The Grapes Escaped - Why the First Amendment Matters
  63. Appellate Court Ruling Strikes Blow Against State’s Arbitrary Beer Label Ban
  64. Illinois Attorney General's Office Announces Intention to Dismiss False Claims Act Against Liquor Retailers
  65. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part III
  66. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part II
  67. Craft Beverages: Social Media Marketing the Effective and Compliant Way
  68. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part I
  69. A LAYPERSON LOOKS AT ARSENIC IN WINE
  70. The Biggest Retailer in the World vs. the TABC
  71. Rebecca Stamey-White presents Emerging Issues in Wine Law
  72. Top Beverage Alcohol Law Firm Adds and Elevates Partners
  73. Illinois Qui Tam Lawsuits—Private Enforcement Of a State Claim: A Bonanza For A Plaintiff’s Lawyer And A Rip-Off Of Retailers
  74. BOOZE RULES OF SOCIAL MEDIA: The Retailer Right to Pay Exception
  75. LIONS AND TIGERS AND TWEETS, OH MY!
  76. AB 2004: Brewer's Incremental Parity with Wine Makers
  77. Expanding, Proud Of It, and Wanting to Tell the World
  78. DC Weighs in Strongly on Third Party Marketer Delivery Services
  79. “Visual Links” between Beer, Wine and Spirits Labels and Retailers Ruled Unlawful in California — the tied house laws run amok
  80. Hard Cider Legislative Update
  81. New Marketing Model for New York – Lot 18 and the NYSLA
  82. Sweeping Changes in Proposed NYSLA Bill Include Expansion for Craft
  83. Minimum Resale Price Policies - How to Control Price-Cutters
  84. AB 2130 – Gloves Off?
  85. “Gluten-Free” Labels for Wine, Beer and Distilled Spirits. We’re Still Waiting.
  86. AB 1252: Sanitation Overkill?
  87. Growlers: Not Just for Beer Anymore
  88. California Legislative Roundup 2014
  89. Build It and They Will Come: Craft Products Get New Privileges in CA and TX
  90. AB 1128: Veto of the “Serve a Minor” Felony Penalty Bill, or How to Lose a Winery in One Sale
  91. California Grocers Association v. ABC, Part 2: California Appeals Court Vacates ABC’s Adoption of a Trade Advisory That Correctly Guided Licensee Conduct
  92. California Grocers Association v. ABC, Part 1: California Appeals Court Prohibits Alcohol Sales at Self-Check Out Stands
  93. AB 1128: The “Serve a Minor” Felony Penalty Bill, or How to Lose a Winery in One Sale
  94. The New York SLA and Online Wine Sales: A Work in Progress
  95. California SB 635: What the 4am Bill Really Means for California Communities
  96. Electronic Invoices in California: Welcome to the 19th Century
  97. The History of Amazon and Wine: What Has Changed?
  98. Third Party Marketing Checklist
  99. BOOZE RULES – PROMOTIONAL APPEARANCES AND AUTOGRAPHS
  100. Washington State: Down the Rabbit Hole of the Tied-House Laws