The RBS Chronicles: If Your Business serves Alcoholic Beverages YOU NEED TO READ THIS AND TAKE ACTION!

BY: John Hinman and Barbara Snider

November 1, 2019

This is our third Blog expressing serious concerns with the California ABC’s proposed regulations for the mandatory alcohol beverage server training program and certification.

The proposed regulations will affect EVERY person who serves alcohol throughout the state whether in a restaurant, hotel, bar, tasting room, stadium, concert, wedding, tourist park, or even at a charitable event.  The ABC preliminarily estimates these regulations will affect about 1 million workers in California.  Our estimate, based on the number of ABC licensed hospitality businesses in the state, is ten times that number.

This Blog updates the status of the adoption of this very important regulation and to describes how you may become involved should the ABC continue to ignore the hospitality industry.

The proposed regulations will be final by January 1, 2020 and, after July 2020, no person may be hired as a waiter/waitress, bartender, tasting room personnel unless that person is CERTIFIED BY THE ABC that he/she has successfully passed the mandatory alcohol beverage server training program and has passed the test given by the ABC with a 70% or higher grade.

AB 1221 was passed in 2017 and directs the ABC to develop a mandatory training program and curriculum for all alcohol beverage servers in the state.  The purpose of the Act is laudatory – to prevent serving alcoholic beverages to intoxicated persons, to control how much is served to a person to reduce instances of drunk driving, and to prevent sales of alcoholic beverages to minors.

However, the proposed regulations as currently written go far beyond the simple intent of the law and if passed, will create a massive ABC bureaucracy rivaling that of the Department of Motor Vehicles in cost, size and complexity.  The regulations propose to collect personal data on every person in California who works in the alcohol sector of the hospitality industry and require scientific training of every server before being allowed to pour a glass of wine, and mandates hundreds of changes to current industry customer service practices.

As we explained in our prior blogs, we support training alcohol servers and believe the law is a major step forward in encouraging training of alcohol servers in California. Our prior Comments, including those filed on November 1st here, and previously filed with the ABC here and here, outline the serious concerns and pitfalls of the ABC’s proposed regulations we see as inevitable should the regulations as currently drafted become law.

The ABC’s “Public Hearing” on October 11th Regarding the Proposed Regulations

The latest event in this proceeding was that the ABC held a “public hearing” in Sacramento on October 11th. We attended and there was only a handful of other participants also attending (the Family Winemakers of California and the TIPS national alcohol beverage training program representatives were among the few other participants).

The few people attending were advised that the ABC would allow only five minutes per speaker and that the ABC would provide no response or entertain any discussion at the “hearing” – period.  No dialogue was permitted and no explanations by the ABC were offered.

On October 18th, the ABC issued its “Response” and “Revisions” to their proposed regulations following the hearing and submission of all written Comments.  The “Response” was empty.  There were only seven small edits to the entire twenty-three page document!  Clearly, the ABC was just going through the motions so it could check off the required procedural boxes and clearly had no intention of listening and responding to any of the Comments. All Comments from all parties were outright rejected. It doesn’t matter how many different “stakeholders” with whom they claimed to have conferred, the bottom line is that the proposed Regulations reach far beyond the scope intended by the 2017 Act.

Examples of the Major Concerns We (and others) Raised

1. Concern: the proposal creates a new state bureaucracy (one that will rival the DMV for cost, size and complexity) where millions of alcohol servers in the state must submit personal information to a state data base where the privacy protections are unclear.

      ABC Response: No changes made. The alternatives of the certificate information being maintained by either the individual licensee or his/her employer were rejected. Our proposed regulations do away with the state-mandated data base and instead require the records to be kept by the accredited training agencies, the individual employer and the individual. That was rejected.

2. Concern: Even though the ABC will accredit different companies to provide the training, the ABC still insists the final examination will be conducted only by the ABC and certification will only be issued by the ABC.  The ABC’s proposed database will hold all the personal information on each beverage server in the state. We proposed to have the accredited training providers administer the final examination and keep the certification for each server passing the exam.

      ABC Response: No changes made. The ABC wants complete control over giving the final examination and the certification for each beverage server; regardless of the cost, the potential confusion and bureaucratic delays.

3. Concern: Employee privacy issues with the private information of every beverage server in the state being held by the ABC on a new database.  The regulations require each server to register with the ABC and provide: (1) legal name, (2) birthdate, (3) email, (4) zip code of current address, and (5) personal identification information (driver’s license, social security number, or similar employment identification number). 

      ABC Response: The ABC slightly revised requiring every server to provide private information by modifying the 5th requirement to providing only the last four digits of the identification information.  This minor change does not change that the reality ABC intends to keep private information for every server in the state in its own new database.

4. Concern: The current course requirements expand five general subjects listed in the legislature’s Act to require actual detailed course content for each subject. This was not the intent of the RBS bill. Our proposed regulations simplify the course requirements and return them to what the legislature mandated. For example, the proposed training requirements related to the effects of alcohol and how the body metabolizes alcohol go far beyond what is necessary for servers to know to observe intoxication, makes not only the content of the course difficult, but also makes passing the exam more difficult than it need be, jeopardizing the employment and livelihood of millions of people in this state who serve alcohol.  

      ABC Response: The ABC basically ignored the petitions to simplify the course curriculum and made only a very minor change that resolves none of the concerns.  The curriculum still requires detailed knowledge of how alcohol passes through the body absorption rates, is metabolized by the liver, specific effects on the central nervous system, different symptoms at different Blood Alcohol Concentration levels and the effect of medications on alcohol consumption.

5. Concerns: The section of the curriculum on ID checking will establish as state law procedures for determining when Business & Professions Code Section 25660 (reliance upon bona fide proof of identification) may be relied upon. This affects every clerk, checker and other person in the state who sells alcoholic beverages, not just servers. Now all ID’s must be pulled out of wallets, manually examined for flaws and compared to exemplar data bases. If that is not done, the ID cannot be relied upon. Every person in a group where one person purchases alcohol will also have to be carded; upon pain of the business losing its right to sell alcohol. If this is to be the law in California it deserves to be discussed. We deleted this requirement and left it to current law.

AND: The new Training program regulation will require servers to now also detect legal or illegal drug use. This creates a whole new area of liability for servers and employers not anticipated in the Legislature’s Act; and not part of the authorizing legislation. We modified this requirement to require “reasonable” belief that the patron is incapacitated.

      ABC Response: Adds a new provision that states: “None of the curriculum topics described in California Code of Regulations Title 4 §§ 162-166 shall be interpreted as imposing new or changing existing requirements on licensees, but instead only define course content requirements for RBS training courses.”  The problem is that the regulations are considered best practices and set the standard so this attempt to mitigate the effect of these regulations will not avoid imposing new standards on licensees as described in the regulations. Rather, it will create the potential for more litigation before the ABC and the courts.

What can we do now?

1. Interested parties have one last chance to submit comments.

      Comments are due by noon, November 4, 2019.

      Comments may be emailed to the ABC at: RBSTPComments@abc.ca.gov

2.  We can contact our legislators regarding the Proposed Regulations going far beyond the scope contemplated by the 2017 Act.

     Further, contact the author of AB 1221: Lorena Gonzalez

     Capitol Office, Room 2114

     P.O. Box 942849, Sacramento, CA 94249-0080; (916) 319-2080
District Office

     1350 Front Street, Suite 6022, San Diego, CA 92101; (619) 338-8090

  1. The RBS Chronicles: If Your Business serves Alcoholic Beverages YOU NEED TO READ THIS AND TAKE ACTION!
  2. RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE ACT HEARING – OCTOBER 11TH IN SACRAMENTO – BE THERE!
  3. WHEN THE INVESTIGATOR COMES CALLING – BEST PRACTICES.
  4. RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE ACT PROPOSED ABC RULES 160 TO 173 – WHY THE RUSH?
  5. The TTB Crusade Against Small Producers and the “Consignment Sale” Business Model
  6. TTB Protocols, Procedures, and Investigations
  7. Wine in a 250 ML can – the Mystery of the TTB packaging Regulations and Solving the Problem by Amending the Regulations
  8. The Passing of John Manfreda of the TTB: a Tragedy for his family and a Tragedy for the Industry he so Faithfully Served for so Long.
  9. Pride in a Job Well-done, or Blood Money? The Cost of Learning the Truth from the TTB about the Benefits to Investigators from Making Cases Against Industry Members
  10. How ADA Website Compliance Works – The Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself, Your Website and Your Social Media from Liability
  11. Supplier and Distributor Promotional “Banks,” Third Party Promotion Companies and Inconsistent TTB Enforcement, Oh My!
  12. “A Wrong Without a Remedy – Not in My America” – The TTB Death Penalty for Not Reporting Deaths
  13. Is a 1935 Alcohol Beverage Federal Trade Practice Law Stifling Innovation?
  14. Decoding the BCC’s Guidance on Commercial Cannabis Activity.
  15. Prop 65 - Escaping a "Notice of Violation"
  16. TTB Consignment Sales Investigations - What is Behind the Curtain of the TTB Press Releases?
  17. Heads Up! The ABC Is Stepping Up Enforcement Against Licensees Located Near Universities
  18. Coming Soon: New Mandatory Training Requirements for over One Million “Alcohol Servers” In California – September 1, 2021 will be here quickly
  19. 2019 Legislative Changes for California Alcohol Producers – a Blessing or a Curse?
  20. A Picture (On Instagram) Is Worth A Thousand Words
  21. Playing by the Rules: California Cannabis Final Regulations Takeaways
  22. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Names Erin Kelleher Partner and Welcomes Gillian Garrett and Tsion “Sunshine” Lencho to the Firm
  23. Congress Makes History and Changes the CBD Game for Good
  24. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  25. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  26. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  27. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  28. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  29. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  30. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  31. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  32. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  33. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  34. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  35. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  36. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  37. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  38. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  39. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  40. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  41. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  42. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  43. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  44. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  45. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  46. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  47. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  48. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  49. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  50. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  51. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope
  52. New Alcohol Delivery Oversight on the Horizon
  53. Michigan: Canary in the DtC Coal Mine?
  54. California ABC and Federal Credit Laws – Active Enforcement and Lots of Questions!
  55. Big Bottles For The Holidays - The Highest Calling Of The Winemaker's Art
  56. FINAL COMMENTS TO TTB NOTICE 160 DUE ON WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 7TH – WE ARE ASKING THE TTB TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD AGAIN TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRY NEGOTIATION AND ALIGNMENT OF INTERESTS
  57. SONOMA COUNTY WINERY USE PERMITS, EVENT RESTICTIONS AND DTC
  58. New TTB Labeling Requirement Regulations: Out-of-State Bottling Is Not Created Equal and Consumers Right to Know Where the Grapes in their Wine Come from is Compromised
  59. Isn't A Written Agreement With A Distributor Worthless In A Franchise State?
  60. Crowd Funding for Alcohol Producers and Retailers – Down the Rabbit Hole with the Tied House laws
  61. Everything you ever wanted to know about the BPA Warning Statement but were afraid to ask
  62. AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights
  63. “Better Late Than Never”-- Judge in Illinois Dismisses 201 Sales Tax Cases against Retailers
  64. The Day the Music Almost Died: The Story of the BottleRock ABC Accusations, the ABC Appeals Board and a Victory for a Common Sense Interpretation of the Tied House Laws
  65. The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means
  66. Counterfeit or Artisanal Mexican Spirits? Pick your Poison, or your lime wedge
  67. Warning - CA ABC enforcement teams are on the prowl this weekend!
  68. RELIEF AT LAST! ILLINOIS MOVES TO FIX THE SALES TAX LAWSUITS AGAINST OUT-OF-STATE SELLERS BUT PROPOSES TO PENALIZE WINERIES AND RETAILERS THAT SHIP WITHOUT PERMITS
  69. The TTB Speaks on Category Management or, be Careful What you Ask for Because you might Get it!
  70. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Announces the Addition of Jeremy Siegel to its team of top beverage law lawyers
  71. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part IV
  72. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part III
  73. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part II
  74. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part I
  75. Hinman & Carmichael LLP is Hiring!
  76. John Hinman Presents NBI Webinar on Basics of Alcohol Beverage Law
  77. ABC DISMISSES SAVE MART GRAPE ESCAPE ACCUSATION BUT REFUSES TO ADOPT JUDGE’S DECISION FINDING NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABC VIOLATIONS
  78. Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!
  79. The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle
  80. Santa Claus isn’t the only one coming to town this Christmas!
  81. Arizona's Direct to Consumer Shipping Rules - An Exercise in Complexity
  82. AB 780 - Social Media and the ABC: The California Legislative “Fix” that Fails
  83. Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases
  84. A Modest Proposal – Adopt the federal rule on Tied-House liability in California
  85. The Grapes Escaped - Why the First Amendment Matters
  86. Appellate Court Ruling Strikes Blow Against State’s Arbitrary Beer Label Ban
  87. Illinois Attorney General's Office Announces Intention to Dismiss False Claims Act Against Liquor Retailers
  88. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part III
  89. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part II
  90. Craft Beverages: Social Media Marketing the Effective and Compliant Way
  91. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part I
  92. A LAYPERSON LOOKS AT ARSENIC IN WINE
  93. The Biggest Retailer in the World vs. the TABC
  94. Rebecca Stamey-White presents Emerging Issues in Wine Law
  95. Top Beverage Alcohol Law Firm Adds and Elevates Partners
  96. Illinois Qui Tam Lawsuits—Private Enforcement Of a State Claim: A Bonanza For A Plaintiff’s Lawyer And A Rip-Off Of Retailers
  97. BOOZE RULES OF SOCIAL MEDIA: The Retailer Right to Pay Exception
  98. LIONS AND TIGERS AND TWEETS, OH MY!
  99. AB 2004: Brewer's Incremental Parity with Wine Makers
  100. Expanding, Proud Of It, and Wanting to Tell the World