MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE

The Upshot

On Monday, August 27th the Chancery court in Mississippi upheld “passage of title” terms of sale, dismissing a case brought by the Mississippi Attorney General alleging illegal shipments of wine into the state by out-of-state retailers. Where the terms of sale, and the transaction documentation, clearly articulate that title passes in the home state of the licensed merchant, the court did not have jurisdiction over the defendants. This case was about consumer rights to buy wine in any state, and personal importation. The case isn’t over, but the victory is important. Read on for more details.

The Sting Operation

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood looked for a sexy issue to burnish his law and order credentials – he found one, retail wine and spirits shipping. However, he didn’t expect the response he got from the accused merchants, and the ruling from the Judge who heard the case.

63 retailers from around the US were targeted in a sting operation conducted by AG Hood; 22 reportedly sold wine to state agents posing as customers, agreeing to the terms of sale, entering orders on-line and directing delivery to themselves in Mississippi. Federal Express and UPS records were sought by the AG. The records were produced by the carriers. Four of the defendants (apparently randomly selected) were sued in Mississippi. The rest were sent warning letters and threatened with prosecution, presumably to be sued after the first four defendants were found guilty.

AG Hood sent out a press release announcing the sting.

The sting involved a state agency ignoring terms of sale and personally importing wine and spirits in violation of state law.  If there was any law violated in this case it was by the agents of the state who traveled to other states, bought alcohol, shipped it to themselves and then charged the out of state sellers with a crime for selling it to them in the first place in the seller’s home state.

The Motion to Dismiss – The Uniform Commercial Code

The defendants, all represented in the Chancery court by Joel W. Howell III of Jackson, Mississippi, and nationally by John Hinman of Hinman & Carmichael LLP, moved to dismiss the complaints.  The basis for the request for dismissal was that the challenged sales had all occurred in the states of licensure of the defendants (New York and California), the terms of sale mandated that title to the products passed in the state of licensure and the buyer was responsible for shipment of the goods. This is based on the Uniform Commercial Code, and the careful placement of UCC terms on each defendants’ website and in the transaction documentation. These “passage of title” terms are not new law. The UCC has been used for many years by many merchants to specify where they do (and do not) do business. The UCC applies throughout the United States (including in Mississippi) and governs all commercial transactions.

The motion was heard in Mississippi on August 23rd.  Rankin County Chancery Court Judge John S. Grant III carefully reviewed the UCC law in Mississippi (which is the same as the law in New York and California) and ruled on Monday August 27th that because the terms of sale included the passage of title in the state of sale, and placed responsibility for any shipment on the buyer (who accepted that responsibility), there was no personal jurisdiction over the defendants and thus no case against them.

The Judge also observed that the defendants were passive sellers in the sense they did not specifically advertise to Mississippi nor did they encourage Mississippi customers to visit their websites (such as by mass mailings or mass emails).

The cases were all dismissed with prejudice.

What this means to Consumers

All citizens of the US, including those in Mississippi, may travel to other states and take possession of wine and spirits for their personal use. Getting it to themselves in states like Mississippi (which are essentially dry, and the state is the seller) is much more difficult. The personal importation laws governing consumer-controlled movement of wine and spirits vary from state to state.

When consumers travel (as they have the right to do), many states (and the federal government for international transactions) have established legislative exceptions permitting consumers to personally import wine and spirits for personal use.  This right is most commonly exercised when visiting foreign countries; but is also available for interstate travel (virtual or actual).

Federal Express and UPS will not officially carry wine for consumers, will not carry spirits at all and require that all merchants shipping alcohol have either permits in the state of delivery or a clear right to ship under state law.

How, when and in what manner (on their person, by common carrier or in other ways) consumers may move their wine and spirits from state to state is a larger discussion, and at its core is a consumer rights issue.  However, the right to own wine and spirits in another state is established regardless of where the consumer resides.

What this Means to the Retail US Wine Industry

This decision (and other similar earlier decisions from other states) clarify the business practices of merchants doing business in their own states. If the terms of sale (including all sale documentation) are carefully structured to require the buyer to pick up the goods at the seller’s location, retailers (and other sellers with the right to sell to consumers - such as breweries, distilleries and wineries) with websites may sell wine, beer and spirits to any consumer regardless of where that consumer may live. This removes the necessity of having to block a consumer from access to the retailer’s website simply because of where he or she officially resides.

This does not, however, address the consumer rights issues created by consumers asking for their wine, spirits or beer to be delivered to them outside of the state in which the goods were purchased.

What about Sales and Use Taxes?

Sales Taxes are collected under the sales tax regulations of the state of sale. Use taxes are the responsibility of the buyer and are governed by the buyer’s state if it differs from the seller’s state. Regardless, nothing is more certain than that the states involved will collect their taxes. In the wake of the Wayfair decision, many states will be evaluating their policies regarding the taxation of goods in their states. Whether any newly enacted legislation will affect “passage of title” remains to be seen.

Is This Case Over?

The Mississippi AG has stated that he will appeal the case.   The defendants are confident that the Mississippi appellate courts will uphold Judge Grant’s decision. It is basic law and it applies nationally. It also appears that Mr. Hood’s decision to appeal is not universally supported in Mississippi.

Regardless, Judge Grant’s welcome application of settled commercial law to the sting attempted by Attorney General Hood reinforces existing precedent important to consumers and retailers throughout the country.

  1. TTB Protocols, Procedures and Investigations
  2. Wine in a 250 ML can – the Mystery of the TTB packaging Regulations and Solving the Problem by Amending the Regulations
  3. The Passing of John Manfreda of the TTB: a Tragedy for his family and a Tragedy for the Industry he so Faithfully Served for so Long.
  4. Pride in a Job Well-done, or Blood Money? The Cost of Learning the Truth from the TTB about the Benefits to Investigators from Making Cases Against Industry Members
  5. How ADA Website Compliance Works – The Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself, Your Website and Your Social Media from Liability
  6. Supplier and Distributor Promotional “Banks,” Third Party Promotion Companies and Inconsistent TTB Enforcement, Oh My!
  7. “A Wrong Without a Remedy – Not in My America” – The TTB Death Penalty for Not Reporting Deaths
  8. Is a 1935 Alcohol Beverage Federal Trade Practice Law Stifling Innovation?
  9. Decoding the BCC’s Guidance on Commercial Cannabis Activity.
  10. Prop 65 - Escaping a "Notice of Violation"
  11. TTB Consignment Sales Investigations - What is Behind the Curtain of the TTB Press Releases?
  12. Heads Up! The ABC Is Stepping Up Enforcement Against Licensees Located Near Universities
  13. Coming Soon: New Mandatory Training Requirements for over One Million “Alcohol Servers” In California – September 1, 2021 will be here quickly
  14. 2019 Legislative Changes for California Alcohol Producers – a Blessing or a Curse?
  15. A Picture (On Instagram) Is Worth A Thousand Words
  16. Playing by the Rules: California Cannabis Final Regulations Takeaways
  17. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Names Erin Kelleher Partner and Welcomes Gillian Garrett and Tsion “Sunshine” Lencho to the Firm
  18. Congress Makes History and Changes the CBD Game for Good
  19. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  20. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  21. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  22. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  23. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  24. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  25. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  26. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  27. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  28. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  29. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  30. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  31. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  32. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  33. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  34. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  35. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  36. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  37. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  38. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  39. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  40. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  41. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  42. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  43. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  44. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  45. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  46. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope
  47. New Alcohol Delivery Oversight on the Horizon
  48. Michigan: Canary in the DtC Coal Mine?
  49. California ABC and Federal Credit Laws – Active Enforcement and Lots of Questions!
  50. Big Bottles For The Holidays - The Highest Calling Of The Winemaker's Art
  51. FINAL COMMENTS TO TTB NOTICE 160 DUE ON WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 7TH – WE ARE ASKING THE TTB TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD AGAIN TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRY NEGOTIATION AND ALIGNMENT OF INTERESTS
  52. SONOMA COUNTY WINERY USE PERMITS, EVENT RESTICTIONS AND DTC
  53. New TTB Labeling Requirement Regulations: Out-of-State Bottling Is Not Created Equal and Consumers Right to Know Where the Grapes in their Wine Come from is Compromised
  54. Isn't A Written Agreement With A Distributor Worthless In A Franchise State?
  55. Crowd Funding for Alcohol Producers and Retailers – Down the Rabbit Hole with the Tied House laws
  56. Everything you ever wanted to know about the BPA Warning Statement but were afraid to ask
  57. AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights
  58. “Better Late Than Never”-- Judge in Illinois Dismisses 201 Sales Tax Cases against Retailers
  59. The Day the Music Almost Died: The Story of the BottleRock ABC Accusations, the ABC Appeals Board and a Victory for a Common Sense Interpretation of the Tied House Laws
  60. The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means
  61. Counterfeit or Artisanal Mexican Spirits? Pick your Poison, or your lime wedge
  62. Warning - CA ABC enforcement teams are on the prowl this weekend!
  63. RELIEF AT LAST! ILLINOIS MOVES TO FIX THE SALES TAX LAWSUITS AGAINST OUT-OF-STATE SELLERS BUT PROPOSES TO PENALIZE WINERIES AND RETAILERS THAT SHIP WITHOUT PERMITS
  64. The TTB Speaks on Category Management or, be Careful What you Ask for Because you might Get it!
  65. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Announces the Addition of Jeremy Siegel to its team of top beverage law lawyers
  66. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part IV
  67. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part III
  68. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part II
  69. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part I
  70. Hinman & Carmichael LLP is Hiring!
  71. John Hinman Presents NBI Webinar on Basics of Alcohol Beverage Law
  72. ABC DISMISSES SAVE MART GRAPE ESCAPE ACCUSATION BUT REFUSES TO ADOPT JUDGE’S DECISION FINDING NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABC VIOLATIONS
  73. Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!
  74. The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle
  75. Santa Claus isn’t the only one coming to town this Christmas!
  76. Arizona's Direct to Consumer Shipping Rules - An Exercise in Complexity
  77. AB 780 - Social Media and the ABC: The California Legislative “Fix” that Fails
  78. Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases
  79. A Modest Proposal – Adopt the federal rule on Tied-House liability in California
  80. The Grapes Escaped - Why the First Amendment Matters
  81. Appellate Court Ruling Strikes Blow Against State’s Arbitrary Beer Label Ban
  82. Illinois Attorney General's Office Announces Intention to Dismiss False Claims Act Against Liquor Retailers
  83. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part III
  84. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part II
  85. Craft Beverages: Social Media Marketing the Effective and Compliant Way
  86. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part I
  87. A LAYPERSON LOOKS AT ARSENIC IN WINE
  88. The Biggest Retailer in the World vs. the TABC
  89. Rebecca Stamey-White presents Emerging Issues in Wine Law
  90. Top Beverage Alcohol Law Firm Adds and Elevates Partners
  91. Illinois Qui Tam Lawsuits—Private Enforcement Of a State Claim: A Bonanza For A Plaintiff’s Lawyer And A Rip-Off Of Retailers
  92. BOOZE RULES OF SOCIAL MEDIA: The Retailer Right to Pay Exception
  93. LIONS AND TIGERS AND TWEETS, OH MY!
  94. AB 2004: Brewer's Incremental Parity with Wine Makers
  95. Expanding, Proud Of It, and Wanting to Tell the World
  96. DC Weighs in Strongly on Third Party Marketer Delivery Services
  97. “Visual Links” between Beer, Wine and Spirits Labels and Retailers Ruled Unlawful in California — the tied house laws run amok
  98. Hard Cider Legislative Update
  99. New Marketing Model for New York – Lot 18 and the NYSLA
  100. Sweeping Changes in Proposed NYSLA Bill Include Expansion for Craft