Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases

As reported in our earlier Blog Post, wineries and retailers that sell online and ship to Illinois consumers have been victimized by a barrage of lawsuits filed by one Chicago law firm to collect sales tax supposedly due on Shipping & Handling charges.  While the claims asserted have largely been meritless, Illinois has allowed the lawsuits to proceed for years.  Because the cost of defending the cases has exceeded the cost of settlement, almost all cases have settled, resulting in a large windfall to the law firm and to the State of Illinois, which has collected a portion of the “back taxes” that were not owed in the first place. 

The government of Illinois has finally decided to put a stop to this process.  On August 28, 2015, the Illinois Department of Revenue issued proposed regulations that embody what has long been the law of Illinois:  wine producers and wine retailers selling wine to Illinois consumers are not required to collect sales tax on Shipping & Handling charges if:

·         The Shipping & Handling charges are stated separately from the price of the wine;

·         The seller offers the option to have the wine picked up at its facility (winery, tasting room, etc.), instead of having it shipped, even if that facility is not in Illinois; and

·         The price of the wine is the same regardless of whether they are picked up or shipped into Illinois, and no additional “profit” is earned on Shipping and Handling charges.

The proposed regulations will not become effective until they are approved by a committee of the Illinois Legislature, which will not occur until after a 45-day period for public comment.  If approved, the regulations would be retroactive to November 2009, effectively eliminating any claims (by the State or Qui Tam plaintiffs) for back taxes on Shipping and Handling under the Illinois 6-year statute of limitations for such claims, if the wine producer or retailer can demonstrate compliance with the requirements.

Notwithstanding that the regulations are not yet effective, the Illinois Attorney General has stated that her Office will review pending claims brought by the plaintiff law firm to collect sales taxes (but not settled claims).   The Attorney General will exercise her prerogative to dismiss any cases brought against a winery that was in compliance with the three requirements of the proposed regulations.  The defendants in the pending cases need to submit affidavits with proof of their compliance with those requirements and the period during which they were in compliance.  (Note that the State could still seek back taxes for any period in which a defendant was not in compliance). 

To obtain this review, the defendants must submit their proof by September 15.  Every defendant that would qualify for relief should contact their Illinois counsel and submit the required proof promptly.  This long-overdue action by Illinois will hopefully end the meritless claims against online sellers in that State.

We are counselling clients to review carefully their terms and conditions of sale.  We encourage all wineries, whether or not they sell wine to Illinois residents in accordance with an Illinois DTC permit, to review their website terms and conditions for compliance with legal requirements.   This basic level of legal due diligence will pay great dividends in preventing exposure to actions such as the ones initiated by the plaintiff lawyers in Illinois.

  1. Congress Makes History and Changes the CBD Game for Good
  2. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  3. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  4. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  5. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  6. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  7. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  8. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  9. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  10. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  11. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  12. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  13. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  14. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  15. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  16. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  17. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  18. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  19. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  20. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  21. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  22. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  23. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  24. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  25. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  26. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  27. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  28. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  29. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope
  30. New Alcohol Delivery Oversight on the Horizon
  31. Michigan: Canary in the DtC Coal Mine?
  32. California ABC and Federal Credit Laws – Active Enforcement and Lots of Questions!
  33. Big Bottles For The Holidays - The Highest Calling Of The Winemaker's Art
  34. FINAL COMMENTS TO TTB NOTICE 160 DUE ON WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 7TH – WE ARE ASKING THE TTB TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD AGAIN TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRY NEGOTIATION AND ALIGNMENT OF INTERESTS
  35. SONOMA COUNTY WINERY USE PERMITS, EVENT RESTICTIONS AND DTC
  36. New TTB Labeling Requirement Regulations: Out-of-State Bottling Is Not Created Equal and Consumers Right to Know Where the Grapes in their Wine Come from is Compromised
  37. Isn't A Written Agreement With A Distributor Worthless In A Franchise State?
  38. Crowd Funding for Alcohol Producers and Retailers – Down the Rabbit Hole with the Tied House laws
  39. Everything you ever wanted to know about the BPA Warning Statement but were afraid to ask
  40. AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights
  41. “Better Late Than Never”-- Judge in Illinois Dismisses 201 Sales Tax Cases against Retailers
  42. The Day the Music Almost Died: The Story of the BottleRock ABC Accusations, the ABC Appeals Board and a Victory for a Common Sense Interpretation of the Tied House Laws
  43. The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means
  44. Counterfeit or Artisanal Mexican Spirits? Pick your Poison, or your lime wedge
  45. Warning - CA ABC enforcement teams are on the prowl this weekend!
  46. RELIEF AT LAST! ILLINOIS MOVES TO FIX THE SALES TAX LAWSUITS AGAINST OUT-OF-STATE SELLERS BUT PROPOSES TO PENALIZE WINERIES AND RETAILERS THAT SHIP WITHOUT PERMITS
  47. The TTB Speaks on Category Management or, be Careful What you Ask for Because you might Get it!
  48. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Announces the Addition of Jeremy Siegel to its team of top beverage law lawyers
  49. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part IV
  50. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part III
  51. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part II
  52. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part I
  53. Hinman & Carmichael LLP is Hiring!
  54. John Hinman Presents NBI Webinar on Basics of Alcohol Beverage Law
  55. ABC DISMISSES SAVE MART GRAPE ESCAPE ACCUSATION BUT REFUSES TO ADOPT JUDGE’S DECISION FINDING NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABC VIOLATIONS
  56. Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!
  57. The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle
  58. Santa Claus isn’t the only one coming to town this Christmas!
  59. Arizona's Direct to Consumer Shipping Rules - An Exercise in Complexity
  60. AB 780 - Social Media and the ABC: The California Legislative “Fix” that Fails
  61. Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases
  62. A Modest Proposal – Adopt the federal rule on Tied-House liability in California
  63. The Grapes Escaped - Why the First Amendment Matters
  64. Appellate Court Ruling Strikes Blow Against State’s Arbitrary Beer Label Ban
  65. Illinois Attorney General's Office Announces Intention to Dismiss False Claims Act Against Liquor Retailers
  66. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part III
  67. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part II
  68. Craft Beverages: Social Media Marketing the Effective and Compliant Way
  69. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part I
  70. A LAYPERSON LOOKS AT ARSENIC IN WINE
  71. The Biggest Retailer in the World vs. the TABC
  72. Rebecca Stamey-White presents Emerging Issues in Wine Law
  73. Top Beverage Alcohol Law Firm Adds and Elevates Partners
  74. Illinois Qui Tam Lawsuits—Private Enforcement Of a State Claim: A Bonanza For A Plaintiff’s Lawyer And A Rip-Off Of Retailers
  75. BOOZE RULES OF SOCIAL MEDIA: The Retailer Right to Pay Exception
  76. LIONS AND TIGERS AND TWEETS, OH MY!
  77. AB 2004: Brewer's Incremental Parity with Wine Makers
  78. Expanding, Proud Of It, and Wanting to Tell the World
  79. DC Weighs in Strongly on Third Party Marketer Delivery Services
  80. “Visual Links” between Beer, Wine and Spirits Labels and Retailers Ruled Unlawful in California — the tied house laws run amok
  81. Hard Cider Legislative Update
  82. New Marketing Model for New York – Lot 18 and the NYSLA
  83. Sweeping Changes in Proposed NYSLA Bill Include Expansion for Craft
  84. Minimum Resale Price Policies - How to Control Price-Cutters
  85. AB 2130 – Gloves Off?
  86. “Gluten-Free” Labels for Wine, Beer and Distilled Spirits. We’re Still Waiting.
  87. AB 1252: Sanitation Overkill?
  88. Growlers: Not Just for Beer Anymore
  89. California Legislative Roundup 2014
  90. Build It and They Will Come: Craft Products Get New Privileges in CA and TX
  91. AB 1128: Veto of the “Serve a Minor” Felony Penalty Bill, or How to Lose a Winery in One Sale
  92. California Grocers Association v. ABC, Part 2: California Appeals Court Vacates ABC’s Adoption of a Trade Advisory That Correctly Guided Licensee Conduct
  93. California Grocers Association v. ABC, Part 1: California Appeals Court Prohibits Alcohol Sales at Self-Check Out Stands
  94. AB 1128: The “Serve a Minor” Felony Penalty Bill, or How to Lose a Winery in One Sale
  95. The New York SLA and Online Wine Sales: A Work in Progress
  96. California SB 635: What the 4am Bill Really Means for California Communities
  97. Electronic Invoices in California: Welcome to the 19th Century
  98. The History of Amazon and Wine: What Has Changed?
  99. Third Party Marketing Checklist
  100. BOOZE RULES – PROMOTIONAL APPEARANCES AND AUTOGRAPHS