AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights

Every licensee in California will be at risk of closure without an effective right of defense if the legislation proposed in AB 2082 (Campos) takes effect.  AB 2082 authorizes an immediate shutdown of any licensee by the ABC and effectively suspends all current due process protections and rights to a hearing in the interim.  All that it takes to close a business down would be a complaint made by a police department or public official to the ABC that there is “direct evidence” of an “immediate threat” to the public safety. This “threat” could either be the result of the operation of the premises, or a result of potentially dangerous conditions in areas close to the affected business.  Under this bill most licensees in cities like Oakland, San Francisco, LA, Fresno and San Jose could be at immediate risk of being put out of business simply because of the dangerous neighborhoods they are located in.

This bill is a hunting license for the police and a lethal weapon for the politicians. While we believe that most police departments and political officials act in good faith and in accordance with their responsibilities to the public, it is also unfortunately the case that an active minority do not. What this bill does is empower the minority of enforcement officials who do not respect, and are frustrated by, the due process safeguards built into the current system.

Unlike current law, which requires notice of violation and a hearing at which a licensee can defend itself, as well a right to an appeal to the ABC Appeals Board (the governing agency over the ABC, and often the only real source of justice because ABC hearing officers are all retired ABC prosecutors), AB 2082 permits the business to be closed first and defenses raised later. This presupposes (of course) that the licensee can immediately find and engage a lawyer; all the while avoiding going bankrupt from being out of business during what will most certainly be months if not years of litigation. This is regardless of the attempt to build impossible to manage expedited procedures into the legislation. Few licensees can make payroll and rent if they can’t remain open, and getting expedited hearings is next to impossible considering the nature of the current hearing system.

This bill is also an open invitation to public official and law enforcement abuse of licensees whose businesses are not well liked because they attract young people, people of color, or the licensee hosts events that irritate neighbors because they create noise, or have experienced substance abuse problems or cause allegedly hazardous traffic conditions.  This includes nightclubs, restaurants that provide entertainment, dancing and music to the younger crowd as well as supplier licensees (such as wineries, breweries and now distilleries) that host events where traffic, noise and substance abuse are alleged to be a problem for the neighbors.  This can also include grocery and liquor stores in undesirable neighborhoods where the clientele is poor and struggling.

All it takes to close a business under AB 2082 is an alleged “immediate threat to public safety.”  Who interprets what the threat really is and what really caused it are at the heart of the danger that this bill poses. For example, we are involved in a current case where the police allege that public safety was threatened because patrons of a club where a hip-hop entertainer played went to a pizza parlor across the street after the club closed and got into a fight with a police officer. How was that the fault of the club?  Yet that is what the police alleged and attempted to prove. Their theory is that the fight would not have occurred had the Club been closed and no patrons been at the show.

Oher “threats” to public safety that have been alleged in recent cases include fights in a parking lot down the block from a nightclub (but not part of the premises, and that services multiple clubs), assaults causing serious injury by one girl against another at a bachelorette party at a winery, incidents on the sidewalk in front of a grocery store involving teen-agers hanging out and harassing passers-by, being caught with drugs at a rock concert in a licensed venue, and a fatal auto accident in the middle of the night on a road in wine county where the driver had been drinking at the licensed premises earlier in the evening. 

These are all incidents which could, under AB 2082, have resulted in the immediate closure of the subject licensed business. In our experience, some police officers (usually acting as surrogates for public officials) consider any licensed business that offers alcohol, music and/or dancing to be a potential threat to public safety.  The fact that due process currently exists forces law enforcement to adopt measured responses to situations that they believe threaten public safety. AB 2082 strips away measured responses, as well as due process, and leaves in its place the potential for arbitrary and punitive reactions.

Do you trust public officials and police to be free from bias against specific businesses, or specific operators?  While the great majority of police officers and public officials are responsible and act in good faith, our experience is that there are a minority of police and public officials who hold grudges for all kinds of reasons. This legislation gives the minority who are frustrated by the concept of due process and having to prove their case the cover they need to go after those who opposed them in the past with immediate retribution.

This is a bill that must be defeated for the licensed alcohol industry to be able to stand up to overzealous officials, whether law enforcement or politicians.  This bill is not intended to solve a public safety problem but rather to hand law enforcement and politicians a lethal weapon to use against licensees.

  1. The TTB Crusade Against Small Producers and the “Consignment Sale” Business Model
  2. TTB Protocols, Procedures, and Investigations
  3. Wine in a 250 ML can – the Mystery of the TTB packaging Regulations and Solving the Problem by Amending the Regulations
  4. The Passing of John Manfreda of the TTB: a Tragedy for his family and a Tragedy for the Industry he so Faithfully Served for so Long.
  5. Pride in a Job Well-done, or Blood Money? The Cost of Learning the Truth from the TTB about the Benefits to Investigators from Making Cases Against Industry Members
  6. How ADA Website Compliance Works – The Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself, Your Website and Your Social Media from Liability
  7. Supplier and Distributor Promotional “Banks,” Third Party Promotion Companies and Inconsistent TTB Enforcement, Oh My!
  8. “A Wrong Without a Remedy – Not in My America” – The TTB Death Penalty for Not Reporting Deaths
  9. Is a 1935 Alcohol Beverage Federal Trade Practice Law Stifling Innovation?
  10. Decoding the BCC’s Guidance on Commercial Cannabis Activity.
  11. Prop 65 - Escaping a "Notice of Violation"
  12. TTB Consignment Sales Investigations - What is Behind the Curtain of the TTB Press Releases?
  13. Heads Up! The ABC Is Stepping Up Enforcement Against Licensees Located Near Universities
  14. Coming Soon: New Mandatory Training Requirements for over One Million “Alcohol Servers” In California – September 1, 2021 will be here quickly
  15. 2019 Legislative Changes for California Alcohol Producers – a Blessing or a Curse?
  16. A Picture (On Instagram) Is Worth A Thousand Words
  17. Playing by the Rules: California Cannabis Final Regulations Takeaways
  18. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Names Erin Kelleher Partner and Welcomes Gillian Garrett and Tsion “Sunshine” Lencho to the Firm
  19. Congress Makes History and Changes the CBD Game for Good
  20. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  21. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  22. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  23. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  24. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  25. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  26. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  27. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  28. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  29. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  30. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  31. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  32. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  33. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  34. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  35. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  36. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  37. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  38. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  39. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  40. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  41. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  42. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  43. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  44. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  45. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  46. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  47. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope
  48. New Alcohol Delivery Oversight on the Horizon
  49. Michigan: Canary in the DtC Coal Mine?
  50. California ABC and Federal Credit Laws – Active Enforcement and Lots of Questions!
  51. Big Bottles For The Holidays - The Highest Calling Of The Winemaker's Art
  52. FINAL COMMENTS TO TTB NOTICE 160 DUE ON WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 7TH – WE ARE ASKING THE TTB TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD AGAIN TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRY NEGOTIATION AND ALIGNMENT OF INTERESTS
  53. SONOMA COUNTY WINERY USE PERMITS, EVENT RESTICTIONS AND DTC
  54. New TTB Labeling Requirement Regulations: Out-of-State Bottling Is Not Created Equal and Consumers Right to Know Where the Grapes in their Wine Come from is Compromised
  55. Isn't A Written Agreement With A Distributor Worthless In A Franchise State?
  56. Crowd Funding for Alcohol Producers and Retailers – Down the Rabbit Hole with the Tied House laws
  57. Everything you ever wanted to know about the BPA Warning Statement but were afraid to ask
  58. AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights
  59. “Better Late Than Never”-- Judge in Illinois Dismisses 201 Sales Tax Cases against Retailers
  60. The Day the Music Almost Died: The Story of the BottleRock ABC Accusations, the ABC Appeals Board and a Victory for a Common Sense Interpretation of the Tied House Laws
  61. The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means
  62. Counterfeit or Artisanal Mexican Spirits? Pick your Poison, or your lime wedge
  63. Warning - CA ABC enforcement teams are on the prowl this weekend!
  64. RELIEF AT LAST! ILLINOIS MOVES TO FIX THE SALES TAX LAWSUITS AGAINST OUT-OF-STATE SELLERS BUT PROPOSES TO PENALIZE WINERIES AND RETAILERS THAT SHIP WITHOUT PERMITS
  65. The TTB Speaks on Category Management or, be Careful What you Ask for Because you might Get it!
  66. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Announces the Addition of Jeremy Siegel to its team of top beverage law lawyers
  67. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part IV
  68. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part III
  69. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part II
  70. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part I
  71. Hinman & Carmichael LLP is Hiring!
  72. John Hinman Presents NBI Webinar on Basics of Alcohol Beverage Law
  73. ABC DISMISSES SAVE MART GRAPE ESCAPE ACCUSATION BUT REFUSES TO ADOPT JUDGE’S DECISION FINDING NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABC VIOLATIONS
  74. Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!
  75. The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle
  76. Santa Claus isn’t the only one coming to town this Christmas!
  77. Arizona's Direct to Consumer Shipping Rules - An Exercise in Complexity
  78. AB 780 - Social Media and the ABC: The California Legislative “Fix” that Fails
  79. Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases
  80. A Modest Proposal – Adopt the federal rule on Tied-House liability in California
  81. The Grapes Escaped - Why the First Amendment Matters
  82. Appellate Court Ruling Strikes Blow Against State’s Arbitrary Beer Label Ban
  83. Illinois Attorney General's Office Announces Intention to Dismiss False Claims Act Against Liquor Retailers
  84. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part III
  85. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part II
  86. Craft Beverages: Social Media Marketing the Effective and Compliant Way
  87. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part I
  88. A LAYPERSON LOOKS AT ARSENIC IN WINE
  89. The Biggest Retailer in the World vs. the TABC
  90. Rebecca Stamey-White presents Emerging Issues in Wine Law
  91. Top Beverage Alcohol Law Firm Adds and Elevates Partners
  92. Illinois Qui Tam Lawsuits—Private Enforcement Of a State Claim: A Bonanza For A Plaintiff’s Lawyer And A Rip-Off Of Retailers
  93. BOOZE RULES OF SOCIAL MEDIA: The Retailer Right to Pay Exception
  94. LIONS AND TIGERS AND TWEETS, OH MY!
  95. AB 2004: Brewer's Incremental Parity with Wine Makers
  96. Expanding, Proud Of It, and Wanting to Tell the World
  97. DC Weighs in Strongly on Third Party Marketer Delivery Services
  98. “Visual Links” between Beer, Wine and Spirits Labels and Retailers Ruled Unlawful in California — the tied house laws run amok
  99. Hard Cider Legislative Update
  100. New Marketing Model for New York – Lot 18 and the NYSLA