What Alcohol Manufacturers and Retailers Need to Know About California’s Extended Producer Responsibility and the May 31 Deadline

California now joins Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington as states that have enacted Extended Producer Responsibility laws for packaging. SB 54 (also known as the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act) is set to significantly impact alcohol manufacturers and retailers selling products both in and into California. The stated purpose of this law is to ensure that “producers” (as defined below, and which in some circumstances may include retailers) of single-use packaging and food service ware take responsibility for the end-of-life management of those materials and increase the use of recyclable and compostable packaging.

SB 54 established an Extended Producer Responsibility program that shifts the financial burden of recycling and packaging waste management away from consumers and local governments and onto the companies that produce and sell packaged goods.

Although SB 54 was enacted in 2022, implementation was substantially delayed while California regulators revised the complex regulations governing how the program would operate in practice. On May 1, 2026, the California Office of Administrative Law approved the permanent regulations, officially triggering the law’s compliance obligations.

For alcohol suppliers, wineries, breweries, distilleries, importers, brand owners, wholesalers, and retailers, SB 54 introduces new compliance obligations. The first major compliance deadline is May 31.

What Does SB 54 Require?

Generally, SB 54 requires “producers” of “covered materials” to:

  • Reduce single-use plastic packaging.

  • Ensure packaging is recyclable or compostable.

  • Participate in and fund a Producer Responsibility Organization (“PRO”), which is an industry-led, nonprofit entity that manages the collection, recycling, and disposal of waste on behalf of manufacturers.

  • Report packaging data and pay associated fees.

CalRecycle published a guidance webpage with helpful resources about compliance and other obligations.

Who is a “Producer” and what is a “Covered Material”?

A “producer” is generally the company that makes a product and owns (or has the rights to use) the brand name on the packaging sold in the state. However, the definition becomes more complicated when determining responsibility for in-state versus out-of-state entities. In some circumstances, responsibility may shift to the in-state brand owner, exclusive licensee, or ultimately the seller or distributor introducing the product into the state. This means that retailers should be aware that they can be considered producers if upstream manufacturers and brand owners are ruled out.

Alcohol manufacturers (and retailers) may be responsible for complying with SB 54 if they make, import, own, or sell alcoholic beverage brands in California. This means that even companies located outside California may still have obligations under the law if their products are sold in the state.

 “Covered material” is broadly defined and includes most single-use packaging routinely discarded after use, as well as certain plastic single-use food service ware such as cups, bowls, plates, and straws. This means the law applies broadly to packaging materials sold or distributed in California, including many packaging and shipping materials commonly used in the alcohol industry.

However, beverage containers subject to the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (the Bottle Bill) are not considered “covered materials.” This means beverage containers (such as glass bottles and aluminum cans) covered by the CRV program are generally exempt from SB 54’s specific fees and recycling targets. However, SB 54 applies to almost all other “covered material” used to transport and sell products, like plastic wraps and shipping boxes.

How Does This Affect Alcohol Manufacturers?

Producers are responsible for ensuring that covered materials satisfy several statutory requirements, including:

  • Reduce the amount of plastic used in covered materials in accordance with the source reduction requirements set forth here and here.

  • Ensure that, by January 1, 2032, all covered material sold, distributed, or imported into California is either:

    • recyclable within California’s recycling system, or

    • eligible to be labeled “compostable” under applicable state compostability standards.

  • Meet mandatory recycling rate thresholds for plastic covered materials:

    • 30% recycling rate by January 1, 2028

    • 40% recycling rate by January 1, 2030

    • 65% recycling rate by January 1, 2032

 May 31 Deadline

Producers have until May 31, 2026, to register with a PRO, register individually, or file for an exemption. Specifically:

  • If choosing to participate in the state’s approved PRO plan, Circular Action Alliance (“CAA”), the producer must register with and submit data to CAA. Joining CAA is what most businesses will do as they allow companies to collectively fulfill legal EPR requirements without individually managing complex recycling operations.

  • If choosing to comply individually, register with the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (“CalRecycle”) and apply to be an independent producer.

  • If qualifying for an exemption for small producer, register with CalRecycle and apply for the small producer exemption. 

 Takeaways

Given the breadth and complexity of the law, confusion and inconsistent interpretations are likely during the early stages of implementation. Businesses will likely grapple with basic compliance questions, including who qualifies as a “producer,” what materials are exempt, and how California ultimately intends to enforce the law.

Companies with questions regarding producer status, exemptions, registration requirements, or packaging compliance should consult experienced regulatory counsel. Early planning and careful analysis may help businesses avoid unnecessary compliance risks as California begins implementing and enforcing this complicated program.

Copyright 2026

This blog is dedicated to occasional (and hopefully interesting) reports of state and national alcoholic beverage regulatory developments that we encounter in our practice. Booze Rules (and any comments below) are intended for informational use only and are not to be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice please consult with your counsel.

  1. What Alcohol Manufacturers and Retailers Need to Know About California’s Extended Producer Responsibility and the May 31 Deadline
  2. Booze Rules 2026: California Alcoholic Beverage Law Update – The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
  3. Old Rules, New Marketplace: Alcohol’s Digital Revolution
  4. Mandatory EFT is Coming Before You know It! Are You Ready?
  5. It’s 2025 and New Laws for the Alcoholic Beverage Industry are Here, or Coming Soon
  6. The California Cash and Credit Laws: Moving to Mandatory Electronic Fund Transfers Between Wholesalers and Retailers on January 1, 2026 – Cash is no longer Legal Tender
  7. Passage of Title Based Sales – Is it Right for You?
  8. BARS AND NIGHTCLUBS BEWARE! THE DRUG TESTING REGIME STARTS ON JULY 1ST AND YOU MUST BE READY!
  9. Strategic Exit Planning: Positioning Your Alcohol Beverage Business for Successful Acquisition or Investment
  10. New California Alcohol Laws for 2024 – a Mixed Bag of Privileges, Punishments, Clarifications, and Politics
  11. TTB Speaks up on Social Media
  12. Alcohol Trade Practices Update
  13. President Biden just made a big cannabis announcement... what does it mean?
  14. The Uniform Law Commission – Encouraging Consistent State by State Definitions, Protocols and Procedures
  15. San Francisco to the Governor - Review the RBS Program and Delay Implementation. Problems must be Corrected.
  16. TTB and Consignment Sales – Is There a Disconnect Between Policy Development and Business Reality?
  17. RBS ADDENDUM – THE LATEST FROM THE ABC AS THE AGENCY PROVIDES MORE INFORMATION ON THE CALIFORNIA ABC’S MANDATORY RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVER PROGRAM
  18. THE STATE OF TO-GO BOOZE IN CALIFORNIA
  19. BOOZE RULES SPECIAL EDITION – THE RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE PROGRAM FACTS AND REQUIREMENTS
  20. Competition in the Beverage Alcohol Industry Continues Under the Microscope – Part 3
  21. Competition in the Beverage Alcohol Industry Under the Microscope – Part 2
  22. Competition in the Beverage Alcohol Industry Now Under the Microscope
  23. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 5: Looking Ahead
  24. It’s Time for a Regulatory Check-Up: Privacy Policies for email marketing and websites
  25. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 4: Who’s responsible for ensuring legal drinking age?
  26. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 3: Follow the Money
  27. BOOZE RULES 2021 – NEW CONTAINER SIZES APPROVED FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES: KEEPING TRACK OF THE TTB’S ATTEMPTS TO REGULATE CONTANER SIZES
  28. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 2: Collect sales tax from marketplaces or comply with alcohol guidance?
  29. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 1: Solicitation of sales by unlicensed third-party providers
  30. Federal Cannabis Legalization Fortune-Telling
  31. BOOZE RULES – THE DIRECT SHIPPING WARS
  32. California ABC provides additional Covid guidance on virtual events and charitable promotions
  33. Hot Topics for Alcohol Delivery 2020
  34. California Reopening Roadmap is Now a Blueprint for a Safer Economy
  35. The Hospitality Reopening Roadmap to Success
  36. Salads Not A Meal in California, Says ABC
  37. Delivery Personnel Beware – The ABC is Coming for You and for the Licensees Hiring You to Deliver Alcoholic Beverages - This Time Its Justified
  38. Licensees Beware – the Harsh New ABC Enforcement Rules Are Effective Right Now
  39. Part 2: LEGAL FAQS ON REOPENING CA RESTAURANTS, BREWPUBS, BARS AND TASTING ROOMS
  40. John Hinman’s May 22, 2020 interview with Wine Industry Advisor on the ABC COVID-19 Regulatory Relief initiatives and the ABC “emergency rule” proposals
  41. Booze Rules May 21 - The Latest on the ABC Emergency Rules
  42. Part 1: Legal FAQs on Reopening CA Restaurants, Brewpubs, Bars and Tasting Rooms
  43. The ABC’s Fourth Round of Regulatory Relief - Expanded License Footprints Through Temporary COVID-19 Catering Authorizations, and Expanded Privileges for Club Licensees
  44. BOOZE RULES – May 17, 2020 Special Edition
  45. ABC ENFORCEMENT - ALIVE, ACTIVE AND OUT IN THE COMMUNITY
  46. Frequently Asked Questions about ABC’s Guidance on Virtual Wine Tastings
  47. ABC Keeps California Hospitality Industry Essential
  48. ABC REGULATORY RELIEF – ROUND TWO – WHAT IT MEANS
  49. Essential Businesses Corona Virus Signage Requirement Every Essential Business in San Francisco Must Post Sign by Friday, April 3rd
  50. Promotions Compliance: Balancing Risk and Reward
  51. The March 25, 2020 ABC Guidance: Enforcement Continues; Charitable Giving Remains Subject to ABC Rules; and More – What Does it all Mean?
  52. Restaurant and Bar Best Practices – Surviving Covid 19, Stay at Home and Shelter in Place Under the New ABC Waivers
  53. Economically Surviving the Covid Crisis and the Shelter in Place Orders: A Primer on Regulatory interpretations and Options
  54. Booze Rules – Hinman & Carmichael LLP and the Corona Virus
  55. Booze Rules: 2020 and the Decade to Come – Great Expectations (with apologies to Charles Dickens)
  56. The RBS Chronicles: If Your Business serves Alcoholic Beverages YOU NEED TO READ THIS AND TAKE ACTION!
  57. RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE ACT HEARING – OCTOBER 11TH IN SACRAMENTO – BE THERE!
  58. WHEN THE INVESTIGATOR COMES CALLING – BEST PRACTICES.
  59. RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE ACT PROPOSED ABC RULES 160 TO 173 – WHY THE RUSH?
  60. The TTB Crusade Against Small Producers and the “Consignment Sale” Business Model
  61. TTB Protocols, Procedures, and Investigations
  62. Wine in a 250 ML can – the Mystery of the TTB packaging Regulations and Solving the Problem by Amending the Regulations
  63. The Passing of John Manfreda of the TTB: a Tragedy for his family and a Tragedy for the Industry he so Faithfully Served for so Long.
  64. Pride in a Job Well-done, or Blood Money? The Cost of Learning the Truth from the TTB about the Benefits to Investigators from Making Cases Against Industry Members
  65. How ADA Website Compliance Works – The Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself, Your Website and Your Social Media from Liability
  66. Supplier and Distributor Promotional “Banks,” Third Party Promotion Companies and Inconsistent TTB Enforcement, Oh My!
  67. “A Wrong Without a Remedy – Not in My America” – The TTB Death Penalty for Not Reporting Deaths
  68. Is a 1935 Alcohol Beverage Federal Trade Practice Law Stifling Innovation?
  69. Decoding the BCC’s Guidance on Commercial Cannabis Activity.
  70. Prop 65 - Escaping a "Notice of Violation"
  71. TTB Consignment Sales Investigations - What is Behind the Curtain of the TTB Press Releases?
  72. Heads Up! The ABC Is Stepping Up Enforcement Against Licensees Located Near Universities
  73. Coming Soon: New Mandatory Training Requirements for over One Million “Alcohol Servers” In California – September 1, 2021 will be here quickly
  74. 2019 Legislative Changes for California Alcohol Producers – a Blessing or a Curse?
  75. A Picture (On Instagram) Is Worth A Thousand Words
  76. Playing by the Rules: California Cannabis Final Regulations Takeaways
  77. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Names Erin Kelleher Partner and Welcomes Gillian Garrett and Tsion “Sunshine” Lencho to the Firm
  78. Congress Makes History and Changes the CBD Game for Good
  79. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  80. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  81. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  82. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  83. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  84. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  85. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  86. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  87. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  88. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  89. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  90. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  91. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  92. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  93. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  94. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  95. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  96. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  97. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  98. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  99. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  100. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform