Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!

As part of our on-going parsing of ABC press releases to identify current trends and issues with enforcement, a recent ABC press release trumpeting a major law enforcement raid in Oakland caught our attention. On one level the release tells an exciting tale about an undercover investigation ripped out of Hollywood.  On another level the release highlights a trend that needs to be thought about long and hard, not just by the authorities but by the entire licensed industry.

It was just not any raid. It was the raid of an underground nightclub; one of the hundreds if not thousands of currently operating underground nightclubs and restaurants in the United States.

As the ABC put it (pretty dramatically for them) in its press release:

On November 6, 2015, agents with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) and officers from the Oakland Police Department (OPD) culminated an undercover investigation and executed a search warrant at an unlicensed underground nightclub located at 361 12th Street, Oakland. Agents arrested the club operators and seized alcoholic beverages, money and illegal drugs during the operation. Both ABC and OPD had received citizen complaints of illegal alcohol sales, loud music and illegal drug use taking place at the location, known as “Studio 361”, often until the early morning hours. On previous dates, agents entered the basement club undercover and confirmed that the illegal activity was taking place. In addition to a full cash bar, the club offered a disc jockey, a dance floor and several smoking rooms for its patrons. Two club operators present on November 6th were arrested for selling alcohol without a license and for possessing cocaine. Agents seized 72 bottles of liquor, a significant amount of beer and wine, and approximately $400 in cash from behind the bar. Agents also found several small bags of suspected narcotics believed to have been abandoned by patrons as agents and officers entered the business. The investigation revealed that advertisement for the club took place primarily through social media and that it largely catered to patrons of licensed bars in the area after those businesses stopped serving alcohol at 2 a.m. as required by law.

Think that this is isolated? Think again.

Check this October story from KQED in San Francisco about an SFPD raid on the “Pink Spot.”

You can Google similar stories in every major metropolitan area of the country.  These “pop-up” clubs and restaurants (foodies are also operating pop-up unlicensed restaurants, where they match food, wine and spirits) have been proliferating for years, and are easy to find. All you need is the event link and, in some cases, the secret entry code; the digital equivalent of “Joe sent me.” Many events also take place out in the open and are advertised freely on-line with the event organizers not thinking twice about whether a license is required for the “private party” at which they charge admission.

The dangers are obvious: no enforcement of the laws prohibiting sales to minors or service to already intoxicated patrons, no attempt to keep the premises free of dangerous drugs or weapons and worst of all, no respect for those who are attempting to operate lawfully.

What’s going on here? And why?

There are three basic reasons for the growth of these unlicensed establishments and pop-up events.

A significant portion of the public wants to party past the legally mandated 2 am closing time

People want to party past the legally mandated closing time in California (2 am is as late as it gets, although many establishments are required to close earlier than 2 am); this is not news. There have been multiple attempts over the last decade to change California law to allow select clubs in entertainment zones to remain open until 4 am (as is the case in NYC and many other large cities).  The local police (supported by the anti-alcohol forces) have blocked every effort on the theory that it will eat up more law enforcement resources and encourage intemperate consumption (as if unregulated clubs don’t?). Social media (which the ABC blamed in their press release) facilitates people of all ages and tastes to easily meet up with each other after hours at private homes, in empty buildings and wherever space can be found to continue the party.

The cost of licensing inhibits new entrants into the entertainment market

The current cost of licenses and permits is so exorbitant (everywhere) that no one except well-funded hotels, restaurant and bar chains can afford them.  Currently a Type 47 or Type 48 (full liquor license) in San Francisco costs approximately $250,000, if one can be found on the open market.  That is a huge investment solely for the right to operate.  That doesn’t include the cost of navigating the use permit, entertainment permit and SFPD approval maze (the SFPD usually starts off a new restaurant by limiting hours to require closure by 10 pm – which just makes the problem worse). This begs the question of whether we really need the current population limitation restrictions on new licenses - - or is there a better way with different forms of licenses for the urban community to grow and prosper?

For the budding club impresario, it’s a lot easier to open a house or go to a warehouse and invest in sound and lighting systems instead of licensing, utilizing social media to build awareness and acquire customers.

All that this accomplishes is the creation of a generation of scoff-laws.

An entire generation of youth are disenfranchised and being trained that the alcohol laws are not something to be respected but rather something to be manipulated.

The age restriction on entry into nightclubs and bars continually disenfranchises the entire generation of those between 18 and 21 who are legally adults but unable to drink or be admitted into most licensed clubs.

False ID’s are everywhere, and are easy to get.  A recent story from Albany NY well illustrates this reality. There, when the authorities raided a nightclub, they found that 115 of the 125 patrons on the premises were underage, and the police confiscated 75 false ID’s.  We know from defending our clients that it’s not easy to identify false ID’s in this modern age, and without a lot more facts no one should jump to the conclusion that the club operators in this situation were to blame without seeing the ID’s that were being used.

The national 21 year old drinking age is a result of Nancy Reagan’s “just say no” mid 1980’s Highway Trust fund extortion racket. Any state that didn’t raise the drinking age to 21 was denied highway trust funds.  It’s time to end that nonsense, and there is a consortium of college presidents (led by John McCardell of Middlebury) that are seeking to do just that through the Amethyst Initiative.

One of the purposes of the repeal of prohibition was to get rid of the speakeasy, the pop-up night club that existed in every dry community before 1934. The speakeasy was run by gangsters, rum-runners and low-life crooks who used the premises to service the underground economy and, more often than not, plot criminal activity. The ease of sharing information about social gatherings on social media, coupled with expensive licenses and unrealistic operating restrictions (hours, music levels, social media restrictions, tied house laws, etc.) is bringing us full circle and running us headlong into the dark past of the entertainment industry.

Do we have an answer? Of course we do. The answer is to be realistic about the laws, the conditions of operation and the adoption of new alcohol restrictions that feel good but are functionally unenforceable. It’s time to start championing real reform at the state and local level.

Looking around the corner at the legalization of cannabis it’s obvious that the new speakeasies are not only not going away but will proliferate and simply add more intoxicants to the menu. It’s time for our industry leaders to reflect on the hard reality of how dysfunctional our current system of alcohol regulation is becoming.

Whenever you read a story about a new “pop-up” club or restaurant (or patronize one) think about the implications – it’s not a pretty picture.

  1. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  2. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  3. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  4. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  5. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  6. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  7. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  8. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  9. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  10. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  11. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  12. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  13. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  14. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  15. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  16. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  17. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  18. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  19. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  20. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  21. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  22. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  23. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope
  24. New Alcohol Delivery Oversight on the Horizon
  25. Michigan: Canary in the DtC Coal Mine?
  26. California ABC and Federal Credit Laws – Active Enforcement and Lots of Questions!
  27. Big Bottles For The Holidays - The Highest Calling Of The Winemaker's Art
  28. FINAL COMMENTS TO TTB NOTICE 160 DUE ON WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 7TH – WE ARE ASKING THE TTB TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD AGAIN TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRY NEGOTIATION AND ALIGNMENT OF INTERESTS
  29. SONOMA COUNTY WINERY USE PERMITS, EVENT RESTICTIONS AND DTC
  30. New TTB Labeling Requirement Regulations: Out-of-State Bottling Is Not Created Equal and Consumers Right to Know Where the Grapes in their Wine Come from is Compromised
  31. Isn't A Written Agreement With A Distributor Worthless In A Franchise State?
  32. Crowd Funding for Alcohol Producers and Retailers – Down the Rabbit Hole with the Tied House laws
  33. Everything you ever wanted to know about the BPA Warning Statement but were afraid to ask
  34. AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights
  35. “Better Late Than Never”-- Judge in Illinois Dismisses 201 Sales Tax Cases against Retailers
  36. The Day the Music Almost Died: The Story of the BottleRock ABC Accusations, the ABC Appeals Board and a Victory for a Common Sense Interpretation of the Tied House Laws
  37. The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means
  38. Counterfeit or Artisanal Mexican Spirits? Pick your Poison, or your lime wedge
  39. Warning - CA ABC enforcement teams are on the prowl this weekend!
  40. RELIEF AT LAST! ILLINOIS MOVES TO FIX THE SALES TAX LAWSUITS AGAINST OUT-OF-STATE SELLERS BUT PROPOSES TO PENALIZE WINERIES AND RETAILERS THAT SHIP WITHOUT PERMITS
  41. The TTB Speaks on Category Management or, be Careful What you Ask for Because you might Get it!
  42. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Announces the Addition of Jeremy Siegel to its team of top beverage law lawyers
  43. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part IV
  44. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part III
  45. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part II
  46. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part I
  47. Hinman & Carmichael LLP is Hiring!
  48. John Hinman Presents NBI Webinar on Basics of Alcohol Beverage Law
  49. ABC DISMISSES SAVE MART GRAPE ESCAPE ACCUSATION BUT REFUSES TO ADOPT JUDGE’S DECISION FINDING NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABC VIOLATIONS
  50. Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!
  51. The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle
  52. Santa Claus isn’t the only one coming to town this Christmas!
  53. Arizona's Direct to Consumer Shipping Rules - An Exercise in Complexity
  54. AB 780 - Social Media and the ABC: The California Legislative “Fix” that Fails
  55. Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases
  56. A Modest Proposal – Adopt the federal rule on Tied-House liability in California
  57. The Grapes Escaped - Why the First Amendment Matters
  58. Appellate Court Ruling Strikes Blow Against State’s Arbitrary Beer Label Ban
  59. Illinois Attorney General's Office Announces Intention to Dismiss False Claims Act Against Liquor Retailers
  60. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part III
  61. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part II
  62. Craft Beverages: Social Media Marketing the Effective and Compliant Way
  63. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part I
  64. A LAYPERSON LOOKS AT ARSENIC IN WINE
  65. The Biggest Retailer in the World vs. the TABC
  66. Rebecca Stamey-White presents Emerging Issues in Wine Law
  67. Top Beverage Alcohol Law Firm Adds and Elevates Partners
  68. Illinois Qui Tam Lawsuits—Private Enforcement Of a State Claim: A Bonanza For A Plaintiff’s Lawyer And A Rip-Off Of Retailers
  69. BOOZE RULES OF SOCIAL MEDIA: The Retailer Right to Pay Exception
  70. LIONS AND TIGERS AND TWEETS, OH MY!
  71. AB 2004: Brewer's Incremental Parity with Wine Makers
  72. Expanding, Proud Of It, and Wanting to Tell the World
  73. DC Weighs in Strongly on Third Party Marketer Delivery Services
  74. “Visual Links” between Beer, Wine and Spirits Labels and Retailers Ruled Unlawful in California — the tied house laws run amok
  75. Hard Cider Legislative Update
  76. New Marketing Model for New York – Lot 18 and the NYSLA
  77. Sweeping Changes in Proposed NYSLA Bill Include Expansion for Craft
  78. Minimum Resale Price Policies - How to Control Price-Cutters
  79. AB 2130 – Gloves Off?
  80. “Gluten-Free” Labels for Wine, Beer and Distilled Spirits. We’re Still Waiting.
  81. AB 1252: Sanitation Overkill?
  82. Growlers: Not Just for Beer Anymore
  83. California Legislative Roundup 2014
  84. Build It and They Will Come: Craft Products Get New Privileges in CA and TX
  85. AB 1128: Veto of the “Serve a Minor” Felony Penalty Bill, or How to Lose a Winery in One Sale
  86. California Grocers Association v. ABC, Part 2: California Appeals Court Vacates ABC’s Adoption of a Trade Advisory That Correctly Guided Licensee Conduct
  87. California Grocers Association v. ABC, Part 1: California Appeals Court Prohibits Alcohol Sales at Self-Check Out Stands
  88. AB 1128: The “Serve a Minor” Felony Penalty Bill, or How to Lose a Winery in One Sale
  89. The New York SLA and Online Wine Sales: A Work in Progress
  90. California SB 635: What the 4am Bill Really Means for California Communities
  91. Electronic Invoices in California: Welcome to the 19th Century
  92. The History of Amazon and Wine: What Has Changed?
  93. Third Party Marketing Checklist
  94. BOOZE RULES – PROMOTIONAL APPEARANCES AND AUTOGRAPHS
  95. Washington State: Down the Rabbit Hole of the Tied-House Laws