The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle

By: Kimberley Corcoran, Carle, Mackie, Power & Ross LLP

 

Today’s Booze Rules Post is from Carle Mackie, Power & Ross LLP.  CMPR is a general practice law firm, is expert in winery land use matters and regularly works with Hinman & Carmichael LLP. Kim Corcoran is a rising star at the firm and this is her report of the November 16th meeting of the Winery Working Group.

 

Wineries and Growers were both Well-Dressed and Organized at Monday Night’s Sonoma County Public Forum.

Much has already been written about the “nuts and bolts” of the November 16th meeting, but the energy and determination that permeated the room was remarkable..  The meeting was the one and only chance for the public to finally have its say in response to the hours and hours of meetings held by the County’s Winery Working Group, prior to hearings before the Planning Commission, then the Board of Supervisors. .  The members of that Group have been working for the last six months to provide direction to the County about new winery applications.  Each of the previous meetings had been held before an audience that was required to stay silent at all times.  Monday night was the time for the County to hear from all of the interested stakeholders, large and small.

Until Monday night, the wineries and growers appeared to be in two camps:  those who were following every breath and sigh of the Winery Working Group and those who didn’t even know that the Group had been formed, or that a new County ordinance was working its way down to them.  Although the discussion of the new ordinance is cast as applying only to new wineries, there is the distinct possibility that the County would apply any new ordinance to existing wineries (whether through applications for increased production or changes to use permits).  As such, whether they knew it or not, every winery and grower will likely be affected by the new ordinance. 

From the more than 500 people who met in Santa Rosa Monday night, the news had finally been disseminated.  More than half of the audience members were there to support the wine business.  It was a refreshing sight to see growers, winery owners, winemakers, and tasting room staff energized, motivated, and wearing brilliant green t-shirts or stickers (brilliant in both their color and their use as a statement).  The anti-winery contingent was there with their plain white nametags and a few placards but Monday night’s energy belonged to the wineries and growers. 

Three central themes came from this energized group.  First, agriculture does not mean grapes growing peacefully by themselves, beyond the touch of human hands.  Instead, agriculture means feeding your family and making the mortgage.  That requires one to sell the grapes/wine, and selling necessarily requires marketing efforts.  Speakers from small wineries presented a compelling case of why they needed what the County calls “events” and what they call distributor meetings or wine club dinners.  Without direct-to-consumer sales, only “the big guys” with their existing distributor outlets would be able to own wineries in Sonoma County.  The “big guys” had their say as well – without being able to hold distributor lunches or dinners, their business model fails as well. 

Another common theme was that the County should not regulate the type of activity going on at the winery.  Instead, the County should be regulating impacts – it shouldn’t matter whether there is a tasting menu, whether a customer sits or stands, or whether there is a fee for a wine club party.  No other business is in danger of having the County decide when, or whether, it can have business or staff meetings.  How can the County do that to wineries?

Finally, the wineries and growers challenged the opposition’s continued mantra of “rural character”.   Without high-end agriculture, the land would be sold for housing.  Housing would not recharge the aquifer, would not maintain the job base, and would be anything but “rural”.  The wineries and growers stepped up to the microphones Monday night by the dozens noting, among other things, that the first word on the Sonoma County seal is “Agriculture” and that pioneers like Sara Lee Kunde had worked tirelessly in the past to make agriculture economically viable.  Making a good living from agriculture is what allows for rural character in the first place. 

This is not isolated to Sonoma County.  Napa is dealing with their own ordinance battles, as is Santa Barbara, Paso Robles and the other wine-growing areas of the state.  Indeed, this “not in my backyard” approach to land use is also reflected in municipal ordinances restricting restaurants, nightclubs and wine stores in major cities throughout the state.

As the meeting approached 8:30 and then 9:00, many of the opposition group trickled out.  The winery and grower contingent just filled-in their seats behind them (about 100 people had not been allowed into the meeting room due to occupancy requirements and had been relegated to the lobby to watch the proceedings on a screen.)  When the meeting finally ended shortly after 9:00, the room was abuzz with energy from the green-clad growers and winery representatives finally being able to say their piece.  Indeed, one of the anti-winery speakers said to another as he was walking out of the meeting early, “The wineries – they’re organized.”  Ah – the power of working together toward a common goal.  

  1. Pride in a Job Well-done, or Blood Money? The Cost of Learning the Truth from the TTB about the Benefits to Investigators from Making Cases Against Industry Members
  2. How ADA Website Compliance Works – The Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself, Your Website and Your Social Media from Liability
  3. Supplier and Distributor Promotional “Banks,” Third Party Promotion Companies and Inconsistent TTB Enforcement, Oh My!
  4. “A Wrong Without a Remedy – Not in My America” – The TTB Death Penalty for Not Reporting Deaths
  5. Is a 1935 Alcohol Beverage Federal Trade Practice Law Stifling Innovation?
  6. Decoding the BCC’s Guidance on Commercial Cannabis Activity.
  7. Prop 65 - Escaping a "Notice of Violation"
  8. TTB Consignment Sales Investigations - What is Behind the Curtain of the TTB Press Releases?
  9. Heads Up! The ABC Is Stepping Up Enforcement Against Licensees Located Near Universities
  10. Coming Soon: New Mandatory Training Requirements for over One Million “Alcohol Servers” In California – September 1, 2021 will be here quickly
  11. 2019 Legislative Changes for California Alcohol Producers – a Blessing or a Curse?
  12. A Picture (On Instagram) Is Worth A Thousand Words
  13. Playing by the Rules: California Cannabis Final Regulations Takeaways
  14. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Names Erin Kelleher Partner and Welcomes Gillian Garrett and Tsion “Sunshine” Lencho to the Firm
  15. Congress Makes History and Changes the CBD Game for Good
  16. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  17. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  18. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  19. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  20. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  21. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  22. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  23. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  24. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  25. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  26. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  27. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  28. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  29. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  30. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  31. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  32. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  33. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  34. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  35. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  36. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  37. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  38. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  39. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  40. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  41. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  42. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  43. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope
  44. New Alcohol Delivery Oversight on the Horizon
  45. Michigan: Canary in the DtC Coal Mine?
  46. California ABC and Federal Credit Laws – Active Enforcement and Lots of Questions!
  47. Big Bottles For The Holidays - The Highest Calling Of The Winemaker's Art
  48. FINAL COMMENTS TO TTB NOTICE 160 DUE ON WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 7TH – WE ARE ASKING THE TTB TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD AGAIN TO ALLOW FOR INDUSTRY NEGOTIATION AND ALIGNMENT OF INTERESTS
  49. SONOMA COUNTY WINERY USE PERMITS, EVENT RESTICTIONS AND DTC
  50. New TTB Labeling Requirement Regulations: Out-of-State Bottling Is Not Created Equal and Consumers Right to Know Where the Grapes in their Wine Come from is Compromised
  51. Isn't A Written Agreement With A Distributor Worthless In A Franchise State?
  52. Crowd Funding for Alcohol Producers and Retailers – Down the Rabbit Hole with the Tied House laws
  53. Everything you ever wanted to know about the BPA Warning Statement but were afraid to ask
  54. AB 2082 - A Hunting License for Police and a Lethal Weapon for Politicians that Deprives Licensees of Currently Available Due Process Rights
  55. “Better Late Than Never”-- Judge in Illinois Dismisses 201 Sales Tax Cases against Retailers
  56. The Day the Music Almost Died: The Story of the BottleRock ABC Accusations, the ABC Appeals Board and a Victory for a Common Sense Interpretation of the Tied House Laws
  57. The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means
  58. Counterfeit or Artisanal Mexican Spirits? Pick your Poison, or your lime wedge
  59. Warning - CA ABC enforcement teams are on the prowl this weekend!
  60. RELIEF AT LAST! ILLINOIS MOVES TO FIX THE SALES TAX LAWSUITS AGAINST OUT-OF-STATE SELLERS BUT PROPOSES TO PENALIZE WINERIES AND RETAILERS THAT SHIP WITHOUT PERMITS
  61. The TTB Speaks on Category Management or, be Careful What you Ask for Because you might Get it!
  62. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Announces the Addition of Jeremy Siegel to its team of top beverage law lawyers
  63. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part IV
  64. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part III
  65. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part II
  66. 2016 LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: Part I
  67. Hinman & Carmichael LLP is Hiring!
  68. John Hinman Presents NBI Webinar on Basics of Alcohol Beverage Law
  69. ABC DISMISSES SAVE MART GRAPE ESCAPE ACCUSATION BUT REFUSES TO ADOPT JUDGE’S DECISION FINDING NO STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABC VIOLATIONS
  70. Speakeasies are still with us, and proliferating!
  71. The War for the Soul of Sonoma County – the Winery Working Group Battle
  72. Santa Claus isn’t the only one coming to town this Christmas!
  73. Arizona's Direct to Consumer Shipping Rules - An Exercise in Complexity
  74. AB 780 - Social Media and the ABC: The California Legislative “Fix” that Fails
  75. Illinois Finally Offers Certainty and Relief for Victims of Sales Tax Lawsuits, but Prompt Action is Required in Pending Cases
  76. A Modest Proposal – Adopt the federal rule on Tied-House liability in California
  77. The Grapes Escaped - Why the First Amendment Matters
  78. Appellate Court Ruling Strikes Blow Against State’s Arbitrary Beer Label Ban
  79. Illinois Attorney General's Office Announces Intention to Dismiss False Claims Act Against Liquor Retailers
  80. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part III
  81. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part II
  82. Craft Beverages: Social Media Marketing the Effective and Compliant Way
  83. Commercial Speech And Alcoholic Beverages - Part I
  84. A LAYPERSON LOOKS AT ARSENIC IN WINE
  85. The Biggest Retailer in the World vs. the TABC
  86. Rebecca Stamey-White presents Emerging Issues in Wine Law
  87. Top Beverage Alcohol Law Firm Adds and Elevates Partners
  88. Illinois Qui Tam Lawsuits—Private Enforcement Of a State Claim: A Bonanza For A Plaintiff’s Lawyer And A Rip-Off Of Retailers
  89. BOOZE RULES OF SOCIAL MEDIA: The Retailer Right to Pay Exception
  90. LIONS AND TIGERS AND TWEETS, OH MY!
  91. AB 2004: Brewer's Incremental Parity with Wine Makers
  92. Expanding, Proud Of It, and Wanting to Tell the World
  93. DC Weighs in Strongly on Third Party Marketer Delivery Services
  94. “Visual Links” between Beer, Wine and Spirits Labels and Retailers Ruled Unlawful in California — the tied house laws run amok
  95. Hard Cider Legislative Update
  96. New Marketing Model for New York – Lot 18 and the NYSLA
  97. Sweeping Changes in Proposed NYSLA Bill Include Expansion for Craft
  98. Minimum Resale Price Policies - How to Control Price-Cutters
  99. AB 2130 – Gloves Off?
  100. “Gluten-Free” Labels for Wine, Beer and Distilled Spirits. We’re Still Waiting.